Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!necntc!adelie!cdx39!jc From: jc@cdx39.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Handwriting (was:Input device) Message-ID: <621@cdx39.UUCP> Date: Wed, 28-Jan-87 11:11:45 EST Article-I.D.: cdx39.621 Posted: Wed Jan 28 11:11:45 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 30-Jan-87 05:55:17 EST References: <1191@ucbcad.berkeley.edu> <191@its63b.ed.ac.uk> <1145@rti-sel.UUCP> <3968@utcsri.UUCP> Organization: Codex Corp, a division of Motorola; Canton, MA, USA Lines: 52 > > Some years later, I made a concerted effort to write my letters > separately rather than joining them all up. As a result, my handwriting > improved to the point where other people can almost always read it !! > > Personally I feel that the 'italic' style of writing is more efficient > than cursive script, since it requires a smaller number of strokes. Well, I adopted Italic script when I was about 22, and I've never regretted the couple hours it took to get it into my subconscious. It has been widely believed (and occasionally even documented) among calligraphers that this script is the most "efficient" form of the Roman alphabet yet devised. What is mean by "efficient" is either of the following equivalent facts: 1) For a given speed of writing, Italic produces the most legible result; 2) For a given level of legibility, Italic can be written the fastest. If you have a pen with an Italic point, the efficiency is especially noticeable. You can also convert most of the "fiber-tipped" pens to italic by using a fine knife blade to cut the tip to a wedge. If you do this, you have to keep the pen away from others, because they'll rapidly destroy it in the process of trying to get it to write. I've read several places that the American longhand taught in our grade schools is historically a "degenerate" Italic, with extra curves, unnecessary connectives, backtracking, and form changes to fit in with the connected style of writing. I found that the hardest thing to teach myself to do was to make the lower-case 'e' with two strokes. At first, this seems somewhat counter-intuitive and clumsy. After a while, I came to understand that it is in fact a net benefit. The explanation is the effects of the longhand 'e' on adjacent letters. One thing that's sort of fun is sending hastily-scribbled notes to people, hearing them remark on the nice handwriting, and tell them that it's nothing special; I could do much better if I were taking care to write well. It's also sort of fun to tell them that they could learn to write legibly with just a few hours effort, knowing full well that few people ever will. I suspect that many people identify with their own handwriting; learning a new script would violate their self-image. But maybe I'm being overly psychological here. -- John M Chambers Phone: 617/364-2000x7304 Email: ...{adelie,bu-cs,harvax,inmet,mcsbos,mit-eddie,mot[bos]}!cdx39!{jc,news,root,usenet,uucp} Smail: Codex Corporation; Mailstop C1-30; 20 Cabot Blvd; Mansfield MA 02048-1193 Clever-Saying: Uucp me out of here, Scotty; there's no AI on this node!