Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!necntc!adelie!ll-xn!olsen From: olsen@ll-xn.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: Future of Minix Message-ID: <440@ll-xn.ARPA> Date: Thu, 29-Jan-87 09:36:33 EST Article-I.D.: ll-xn.440 Posted: Thu Jan 29 09:36:33 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 20:35:55 EST References: <521@csun.UUCP> <10184@tektronix.TEK.COM> <1619@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Reply-To: olsen@ll-xn.UUCP (Jim Olsen) Distribution: world Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory Lines: 13 In article <1619@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> tim@tomcat.UUCP (Tim Kay) writes: >Does anybody know if it would be OK for somebody to distribute a complete, >modified MINIX, assuming that each person it was sent to showed a receipt for >an original MINIX code purchase? It is not OK. A copyright holder has the exclusive right to make 'derivative works.' A modified MINIX would be a derivative of MINIX. Tenenbaum may wish to waive some of his rights to control derivatives of MINIX, but that's up to him. -- Jim Olsen ...!{decvax,linus,adelie}!ll-xn!olsen