Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!violet.berkeley.edu!dean From: dean@violet.berkeley.edu.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Extensions to MINIX or... The Courts of Chaos Message-ID: <2335@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Sat, 24-Jan-87 14:17:41 EST Article-I.D.: jade.2335 Posted: Sat Jan 24 14:17:41 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Jan-87 14:44:51 EST Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: dean@violet.berkeley.edu (Dean Pentcheff) Followup-To: comp.os.minix Distribution: world Organization: University of California, Berkeley Department of Zoology Lines: 39 Keywords: minix extensions administration Summary: High confusion potential approaching I keep reading (with interest and excitement) about MINIX and its proposed extensions. We may wish to address (now, before things start happening) the problem of keeping track of all the good modifications people make. It's one thing to subscribe to *.sources and try out the interesting looking programs - it's a bit tougher to try out different kernal (kernel?) modifications, each of which may depend on the presence or absence of others. I have a sneaking suspicion that Andy Tanenbaum is not going to want to spend the rest of his waking hours administrating the maintenance and extension of MINIX. Just as a pre-proposal to think about, I could forsee the following developments. i) The official Prentice-Hall distribution. This would form the core of the system and would remain largely unchanged except for bug-fixes. Very few, if any, extensions would be made to this version (subject to the author's and publisher's discretion, of course). ii) A semi-official collection of tested, documented, and coordinated extensions, maintained somewhere on the net by a group of Good People who foolishly volunteer their time for this project. These extensions would come from: iii) Unofficial postings of extensions in this group, which people would be free to try out, improve, rant and rave about, etc. Once an extension reached some stability and consensus of usefulness, the Good People could pick it up, pester the poster for adequate documentation, and add it to the canonical list of extensions. This system would give those of us who want a somewhat stable system a chance to benefit from improvements, while those of us who want to live on the dangerous (but fun) cutting edge could try out all the new gizmos. Of course, it all hinges on finding a group of Good People who are bright enough to do the job, but dumb enough to volunteer. As my 7th grade social studies teacher used to say: "Questions-problems- comments-answers??" -Dean Pentcheff (dean@violet.berkeley.edu)