Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!houxm!hoqam!vedm
From: vedm@hoqam.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: net.sources/comp.sources.d -- WHAT'S THE DEAL???
Message-ID: <318@hoqam.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 18-Jan-87 22:06:21 EST
Article-I.D.: hoqam.318
Posted: Sun Jan 18 22:06:21 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Jan-87 03:54:24 EST
References: <568@think.COM>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel
Lines: 24

> 
> This isn't funny. For the *second* time, net.sources just got
> rmgroup'ed here. *WHY*??? It was rm'ed a while ago, then revived.
> Since then, a LOT of traffic has come through it - 10 or more articles
> a day. Then, today when I run rn, it says net.sources is a bogus
> newsgroup. THIS MAKES NO SENSE!!! comp.sources.unix was never born,
> and as we all know, mod.sources is less than active. So, what are
> we gonna do???
> 
> Personally, I would like to see comp.sources.unix and comp.sources.games
> created. net.sources/net.sources.games/net.sources.bugs are (were?)
> the ONLY net.* groups in my .newsrc... The switchover will not be
> complete until we get rid of them. SO WHY WAIT???
> 
> Cheers. --Erik

I agree that net.sources should be REPLACED not continually newgroup'd
and rmgroup'd.

What exactly is the holdup?
Why has this group been omitted from the reorg?

Tom.
...!{decvax | ucbvax}!ihnp4!hoqax!twb