Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!lll-lcc!langdon
From: langdon@lll-lcc.aRpA (Bruce Langdon)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Discussion of Common TeX.
Message-ID: <548@lll-lcc.aRpA>
Date: Wed, 21-Jan-87 01:43:09 EST
Article-I.D.: lll-lcc.548
Posted: Wed Jan 21 01:43:09 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Jan-87 21:54:57 EST
References: <11628@brunix.UUCP>
Organization: Lawrence Livermore Labs, Livermore Ca
Lines: 17
Summary: comp.text is fine for Common TeX

In article <11628@brunix.UUCP>, kbb@nancy (Karl Berry.) writes:
> Could we please move discussion of Common TeX source code,
> ...., and so on to comp.sources.d or some
> other more appropriate newsgroup? comp.text is supposed to
> be for discussion of text processing, typesetting, ...

Exactly. And it's done with computer programs. Such as those that
Monnari creates. Common TeX, among other things, is EXACTLY the
sort of thing that I hope to learn about when I read comp.text.
(I have my own list of things that appear here that I don't need.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
	Bruce Langdon  L-472                langdon@lll-lcc.ARPA
	Physics Department                  "langdon#bruce%d@lll-mfe.ARPA"
	Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory       
	Livermore, CA 94550                 (415) 422-5444
UUCP: ..{ihnp4,qantel,ucdavis,pyramid,styx,topaz}!lll-lcc!langdon
                  ..{gymble,ll-xn,seismo}!lll-crg!lll-lcc!langdon