Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!tikal!sigma!bill
From: bill@sigma.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: uuslave.c (Help with UUCP protocol)
Message-ID: <1040@sigma.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 28-Jan-87 12:17:47 EST
Article-I.D.: sigma.1040
Posted: Wed Jan 28 12:17:47 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 02:35:55 EST
References: <1911@ncoast.UUCP> <1683@hoptoad.uucp> <1943@ncoast.UUCP>
Reply-To: bill@sigma.UUCP (William Swan)
Organization: Summation Inc, Kirkland WA
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath comp.sources.d:207 comp.unix.wizards:744

>1943@ncoast.UUCP> allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery):
>>1683@hoptoad.uucp> by pozar@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Pozar):
>>I picked off the uuslave code.  [...]
>The posting mentioned the fact that we're all pretty well stumped by it.
>[...]
>It *does* seem to be written for CP/M, as opposed to MS-DOS.  This might mean
>Aztec or BDS C, the two most common for CP/M.

It is *not* written for BDS C. I have been studying it for a bit and have
resolved pretty much everything EXCEPT the "inita/initb,initc" part of
the protocol. It appears that there may be some information exchanged in
this part of the protocol, but there is insufficient information on what
this might be. (It's also possible that this part of the protocol is
bogus). Can any UUCP experts out there enlighten me/us?