Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!ddl
From: ddl@husc6.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: yacc, again
Message-ID: <1217@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 12-Feb-87 18:35:53 EST
Article-I.D.: husc6.1217
Posted: Thu Feb 12 18:35:53 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Feb-87 21:16:50 EST
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge MA
Lines: 12


	Before someone else jumps on it, I should mention that I have
been (incorrectly) using the word proprietary in what I thought was
the current context:  something protected only by trade secret and
non-disclosure agreements.  None of the arguments I made apply (or were
meant to apply) to patents and copyrights which are still proprietary
in the sense of ownership.  So please substitute trade-secret for
proprietary.  Patents can't create the problem I'm worried about because
you can send for a copy to verify ownership.

					Dan Lanciani
					ddl@harvard.*