Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!hao!woods
From: woods@hao.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,news.groups
Subject: Re: comp.sys.amiga moderation?
Message-ID: <510@hao.UCAR.EDU>
Date: Thu, 29-Jan-87 18:46:52 EST
Article-I.D.: hao.510
Posted: Thu Jan 29 18:46:52 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 04:12:31 EST
References: <2950@j.cc.purdue.edu> <3830@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1296@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <2485@well.UUCP> <253@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU>
Reply-To: woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods)
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 20
Summary: Sometimes the choice is moderation or death
Xref: watmath comp.sys.amiga:1785 news.groups:262

In article <253@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU> mende@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU (Bob Mende) writes:
>
>   I was
>telling everyone the impossiblity of moderating such a high volume
>group!

  The alternative may be that certain sites that have very high phone bills
but few or no Amiga users may drop the group, thus limiting its distribution
and therefore its usefulness. If you don't want such groups (and this is
not to pick on Amiga; the same applies to Mac, PC, etc. source groups) to
be moderated, then I would recommend coming up with some other ways of
reducing volume to reasonable levels before the hammer falls. Personally,
I don't think there are any, but I certainly welcome constructive suggestions.

--Greg
-- 
--
UUCP: {hplabs, seismo, nbires, noao}!hao!woods
CSNET: woods@ncar.csnet  ARPA: woods%ncar@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
INTERNET: woods@hao.ucar.edu