Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!george
From: george@scirtp.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,news.groups
Subject: Re: comp.sys.amiga moderation?
Message-ID: <783@scirtp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Jan-87 16:26:13 EST
Article-I.D.: scirtp.783
Posted: Fri Jan 30 16:26:13 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 19:40:44 EST
References: <2950@j.cc.purdue.edu> <3830@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1296@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <2485@well.UUCP> <253@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU>
Organization: SCI Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath comp.sys.amiga:1823 news.groups:270


> From: perry@well.UUCP (Perry S. Kivolowitz)
> > Sorry Bob, I just don't trust the moderated news group principle any more.
> > NO TO A MODERATED AMIGA GROUP. 
> 
>    If I did not make myself clear... I DO NOT WANT ONE EITHER!!  I was
> telling everyone the impossiblity of moderating such a high volume
> group!
> 
> 				Bob
Surely it will be possible for both
	comp.sys.amiga    
and	COMP.SYS.AMIGA  
to exist.  Nobody really intentionally proposed getting rid
of the non-moderated group, did they?  It is unfortunate if
something was read that way.