Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cognos.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!cognos!glee
From: glee@cognos.UUCP (Godfrey Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,news.groups
Subject: Re: comp.sys.amiga moderation?
Message-ID: <348@cognos.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Feb-87 17:43:39 EST
Article-I.D.: cognos.348
Posted: Mon Feb  2 17:43:39 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 3-Feb-87 23:35:52 EST
References: <2950@j.cc.purdue.edu> <3830@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1296@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <2485@well.UUCP> <253@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU> <783@scirtp.UMon, 2-Feb-87 17:43:39 EST
Reply-To: glee@cognos.UUCP (Godfrey Lee)
Organization: Cognos Inc., Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 14
Xref: dciem comp.sys.amiga:1858 news.groups:289
Summary: 

Judging from the current state of affairs in the Amiga groups, I would say 
that a single unmoderated group is the best solution. The signal to noise
ratio is good, software that are posted are high quality, software is
effectively archived via the Fred Fish disks, all the benefits of a moderated
group and a moderated source group supposedly provides!!

If the group (comp.sys.amiga - unmoderated) deteriorates, let's re-examine.
For now, LEAVE IT ALONE AND LET US STOP DISCUSSING THIS - THIS IS NOISE!
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Godfrey Lee, Cognos Incorporated, 3755 Riverside Drive,
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA  K1G 3N3
(613) 738-1440				decvax!utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!cognos!glee
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------