Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cuae2!gatech!lll-lcc!styx!ames!orville!fouts From: fouts@orville.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Laser printer Message-ID: <324@ames.UUCP> Date: Fri, 13-Feb-87 12:25:37 EST Article-I.D.: ames.324 Posted: Fri Feb 13 12:25:37 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Feb-87 22:54:24 EST References: <8702051433.AA26615@inria.UUCP> <4271@utah-cs.UUCP> <144@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <558@atari.UUCP> <264@gssc.UUCP> Sender: usenet@ames.UUCP Reply-To: fouts@orville.UUCP (Marty Fouts) Distribution: comp Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA Lines: 25 Wait a minute, before we all cover our selves with napalm and light matches: the (speed) relationship between traverse a display list and blast a bit map is not a strict ordering. In part it depends on what you are measuring. One set of measurements is the device's ability to draw the page from the description. It is always true that it is faster to print a bitmap then to print a display list using this measurement, because all raster printout ends up being print the bit map, which means that print the display list requires translate the display list to a bit map and print it. Since translate takes a positive amount of time, it takes longer. However, it is sometimes more interesting to measure how long it takes to print a page from the point of view of a device (such as the ST) which has to transmit the page to be printed. In this case, communications costs have to be included. There are some cases where sending a postscript description to a slow interpretter can take less time per page than sending bitmaps, and some where it can't. It depends on the relitive speeds of the interpretter and the communications channel, and the degree of complexity of the image. Sometimes the complexity wins for the display list, because the amount of information is small compared to a bit map, so that communication time dominates; but sometimes it loses, because the effort to translate is large compared to both.