Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!wisdom.BITNET!aharon From: aharon@wisdom.BITNET (Aharon Shtull-Trauring) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: problems with Hercules compatible card Message-ID: <8701200750.AA26234@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Tue, 20-Jan-87 02:50:49 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8701200750.AA26234 Posted: Tue Jan 20 02:50:49 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Jan-87 22:38:54 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 52 Hi. I am the (not so) proud owner of a Taiwanese PC-Clone which my wife uses for her word-processing, editing and translating business. I bought a Hercules "compatible" card as well as a CGA "compatible" card - the latter for running games for my kids. I have several problems: (1) When the CGA card is in the computer, the Hercules card acts as if its brain damaged. Letters looked half-baked and are unreadable. The documentation (which reads as if it was written by a Taiwanese who only knew Urdu) for the monochrome graphics card says that the card has 2 32K buffers of graphics memory, and that if you wnat it to live peacably with a CGA card you must disable page 1 by running a program called half (or else sending something to a register via basic). None of these things seem to help or hinder. (2) In monochrome mode, when I do a dir, my monitor starts raining Greek letters. This is especialy noticeable when I go into Turbo mode (I have a 8088-2 that can run at 8+ MHZ). I thought the card may have some sort of refresh problem, but running th Borland graphics toolbox demo works beautifully, even at 8 MHZ (in fact it of course looks much better running at 8MHZ) (3) My wife uses the Hercules card for Microsoft Word. When she runs a disk that has system 2.1 or higher the Hercules card does strange things while in word. It only works 100% properly when booting of a disk with 2.0 (the command.com can be 2.11) Help!!! Can Hercules live with CGA and is it just my clone that stinks, or is there some vital piece of information that the "technical wizards" who sold me this clunker just don't know (or aren't saying). On another topic, I would like to understand the difference between different density diskettes. It doesn't seem to matter if I use single-sided double density or double-sided double-density - I stillo get 360K. Why? Any help would be most appreciated: Aron Shtull-Trauring (aharon@wisdom.bitnet) (aharon%wisdom.bitnet@wiscvm.wisc.edu)