Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!houxm!hjuxa!catnip!ben From: ben@catnip.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: RLL controler Message-ID: <467@catnip.UUCP> Date: Thu, 5-Feb-87 21:48:07 EST Article-I.D.: catnip.467 Posted: Thu Feb 5 21:48:07 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 7-Feb-87 18:27:14 EST References: <1083@ethos.UUCP> <4791@watmath.UUCP> Reply-To: ben@catnip.UUCP (Bennett Broder) Distribution: na Organization: The Broder Residence, Holmdel, NJ 07733 Lines: 46 In article <4791@watmath.UUCP> rwwetmore@watmath.UUCP (Ross Wetmore [ICR]) writes: >From article <1083@ethos.UUCP>: > >> I just read about the RLL (Run Length Limited) controlers in the >> Febuary issue of Computer Shoper. It seems almost too good to be >> true. Has anyone tried these controlers that could report on their >> performance/compatibility? > > I have known of them for some time, but never seemed to get any detailed >information on them. Since there seem to be a number of users on the net >with them, perhaps this is a good time and place to ask the following: > >1) What (if any) specific hardware upgrades are required to use RLL > controllers besides the controller itself and compatible disk? Are > there any modifications to the disk to enable it to run with an RLL > (as opposed to normal) controller? There are no specific hardware upgrades required. All you need is a PC or XT clone and a compatible drive. Generally, most drives with plated media will work. I believe Adaptec has also published a list. >2) Corollary: how does a standard ROM expecting 17 sectors/track manage > to deal with the RLL sectoring? Simple. The only ROM on a PC or XT that knows about how many sectors there are per track is the one on the controller card. Since the RLL controller comes with the proper ROM installed this is not a problem. Note that the reason you haven't seen RLL controllers for the AT and AT clones is that these machines has 17 sector specific code in ROMs on the motherboard. >4) What OS do you use? Has anyone used RLL disks with MicroPort Unix? > Xenix? Are there any problems with interaction or incompatibility > with the OS itself, or distributed programs? Microport Unix runs only on the AT, hence it is incompatible with the current crop of RLL cards. I don't know about Xenix, but I can tell you that it isn't in the list of compatible controller in the release notes. -- Ben Broder {ihnp4,decvax} !hjuxa!catnip!ben {houxm,clyde}/