Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!mordor!styx!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!sdcsvax!nosc!marlin!aburto From: aburto@marlin.UUCP (Alfred A. Aburto) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: 80286/80386 Benchmarks Message-ID: <930@marlin.UUCP> Date: Thu, 22-Jan-87 20:05:29 EST Article-I.D.: marlin.930 Posted: Thu Jan 22 20:05:29 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 23-Jan-87 21:27:30 EST References: <379@qiclab.UUCP> Reply-To: aburto@marlin.nosc.mil.UUCP (Alfred A. Aburto) Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego Lines: 35 Keywords: 80286 80286 msdos benchmark Xref: mnetor comp.sys.ibm.pc:1178 comp.sys.intel:113 In article <379@qiclab.UUCP> neighorn@qiclab.UUCP (Steven C. Neighorn) writes: > > > The following benchmarks were compiled from three machines I have easy >access to. Every attempt at careful measurement and control was made. My >hope is to share the results with others who might be interested in seeing >a comparison of three different AT class machines running small programs at >different clock speeds/wait states. Certainly, this is not intended to be an >ultra-scientific laboratory controlled benchmark listing, as is obvious by >my inclusion of the much maligned Norton SysInfo value. I hope everyone finds >something useful in the table that follows. Comments are more than welcome and >would be appreciated. > Steven C. Neighorn: Thanks for the benchmark results. The Sieve and Savage results ( SIEV.EXE 87BENCH.EXE, and 88BENCH.EXE ) are interesting to me because I have run these on a Commodore-Amiga Turbo-Amiga ( 68020/68881 running at 14.32 MHz ). The Savage took 0.39 seconds and the Sieve 0.8 seconds at 14.32 MHz with 32-bit memory. What I am wondering about is: (1) What Language did you use, and (2) could you upload the Sieve and Savage programs because I'm not sure that I was running the same code as yourself (even though the program names are the same). I ran Gibreath's Sieve using Lattice C. The Savage was run with Absoft's 68020/68881 compiler for the Amiga. I found that IEEE single precision was quick but grossly inaccurate in running the Savage so I ran it in double precision. Thanks. Al Aburto