Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!decwrl!decvax!ucbvax!jade!lapis.berkeley.edu!oster From: oster@lapis.berkeley.edu.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Animated watch cursor. Message-ID: <2359@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Wed, 28-Jan-87 23:43:13 EST Article-I.D.: jade.2359 Posted: Wed Jan 28 23:43:13 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 03:59:03 EST References: <7488@decwrl.DEC.COM> <603@runx.OZ> <607@runx.OZ> <765@vaxb.calgary.UUCP> <176@trwspf.UUCP> Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: oster@lapis.berkeley.edu.UUCP (David Phillip Oster) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 23 The animated watch hands spin because they are spun by a separate task (So there, all you Amiga owners.) As a result, the watch hands often continue to spin even when the program has crashed. Menu Clock, the clock on the menu bar, only updates the time when an application gives it permission to by calling SystemTask(). If the time colon stops blinking for a long time, then you have a hint that the system is hung that is a little clearer for me than the watch hand. Since the watch hand runs as a separate task, it is eating CPU time at the very time when all the CPU is needed by the main task to get the job done faster. Now if it were really a countdown timer that let you know how long the job would take, that would be another matter, but as it stands it is a bad idea for two reasons: 1.) it attracts attention to the screen when there really isn't any reason for the machine to get our attention. 2.) it eats processing power when processing power is scarce. I think these override its cuteness value. --- David Phillip Oster -- "We live in a Global Village." Arpa: oster@lapis.berkeley.edu -- Uucp: ucbvax!ucblapis!oster -- "You are Number Six."