Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!djd
From: djd@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU (Dave D'Souza)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Mac vs. Amiga
Message-ID: <4624@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 21-Jan-87 17:57:05 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.4624
Posted: Wed Jan 21 17:57:05 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Jan-87 01:48:33 EST
References: <8515@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Reply-To: djd@eddie.MIT.EDU (Dave D'Souza
Organization: MIT, EE/CS Computer Facilities, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 23
Keywords: Mac, Amiga
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.amiga:1582 comp.sys.mac:885 comp.sys.m68k:130 comp.sys.misc:232


Come on, let's stop this ridiculous debate now.  This subject has been
beaten to death already. Please note that the original submitter of
the question asked that resposes be e-mailed directly to him and NOT
posted to the net. Also, a summary was promised and this will be more
interesting than the individual letters. 

Please don't bother others with this cruft. I am quite sure many have
had to replace worn out K keys after previous such debates.

Here is is original author's address...

In article <8515@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> buchholz@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Elliott Buchholz) writes:
> {stuff deleted}
>I would appreciate some as-unbiased-as-possible opinions on what my
>best deal is.
>
>Please E-mail your responses to me, and I will tally up the responses
        ============================
>and post what the general majority opinion is.

>^ ARPA: buchholz@topaz.rutgers.edu 				          ^
>^ UUCP: ...!{harvard|seismo|pyramid}!rutgers!topaz!buchholz	          ^