Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!nbires!hao!hplabs!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim
From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Re: Mac vs. Amiga
Message-ID: <5240@ism780c.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-Jan-87 15:43:13 EST
Article-I.D.: ism780c.5240
Posted: Thu Jan 22 15:43:13 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 23-Jan-87 06:48:09 EST
References: <8520@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <1270@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 16
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.amiga:1619 comp.sys.mac:909 comp.sys.m68k:144 comp.sys.misc:238

In an article, Dave Haynie writes:
>
> The Amiga IS the only computer in this price range that has a
> real OS.  If you don't know what a real OS is, I can suggest
> several books on the subject.  Or ask a UNIX wiz why MS-DOS
> doesn't qualify as a real OS.

Please explain how the Amiga has a real OS, but the Mac does 
not.  While you're at it, please explain why Amiga-DOS is a real 
OS, but PX/IX is not.  

-- 
Religion: just say "no"

Tim Smith       USENET: sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim   Compuserve: 72257,3706
                Delphi or GEnie: mnementh