Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!husc4!grunau_b
From: grunau_b@husc4.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Mac vs. Amiga
Message-ID: <1117@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 28-Jan-87 11:28:38 EST
Article-I.D.: husc6.1117
Posted: Wed Jan 28 11:28:38 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 29-Jan-87 06:05:37 EST
References: <8515@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <8520@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <1533@lsuc.UUCP> <596@rayssd.RAY.COM>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: grunau_b@husc4.UUCP (justin grunau)
Organization: Harvard Science Center
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath comp.sys.amiga:1751 comp.sys.mac:995 comp.sys.m68k:182 comp.sys.misc:261

In article <596@rayssd.RAY.COM> jxc@rayssd.RAY.COM (Jeffrey J. Clesius) writes:
>Jim Omura writes:
>>      Pete Korn's point about Magic Sac only running 5% of Mac software may
>> be right.  ...  It seems to run the majority of the most important programs.
>
>Jim, are you implying that of all the wonderful Mac software that we hear
>Mac users boasting about constantly, that only 5% of it is made up of
>important programs?  Hmmm...  :-)
. . .
>      !  {allegra, decvax!brunix, linus} rayssd!jxc


My estimate would probably be more like 1%.


grunau@husc4.UUCP
OR
{ seismo | rutgers | decvax!ihnp4 } !husc6!husc4!grunau