Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!cit-vax!tybalt.caltech.edu!woody
From: woody@tybalt.caltech.edu (William Edward Woody)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Re: Mac vs. Amiga
Message-ID: <1551@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Date: Wed, 21-Jan-87 16:10:26 EST
Article-I.D.: cit-vax.1551
Posted: Wed Jan 21 16:10:26 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Jan-87 01:41:37 EST
References: <8520@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <1270@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Sender: news@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu
Reply-To: woody@tybalt.caltech.edu.UUCP (William Edward Woody)
Organization: Calfornia Institute of Technology
Lines: 17
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.amiga:1581 comp.sys.mac:884 comp.sys.m68k:129 comp.sys.misc:231


Uh, isn't this COMP.SYS.MAC, and not COMP.SYS.MAC&AMIGA&ATARI&Whatever else?

I think the Amiga is cute, and the Atari is cute, and they both are great
machines for certain tasks, just as the Mac is cute and great for whatever
tasks it's good for.

But can we leave the follow ups on if the Amiga is better than the Atari
somewhere else?

Thanks.



- William Woody                          Mac! > ][n && /|\
  woody@tybalt.caltech.edu
  woody@juliet.caltech.edu