Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!cernvax!cgcha!wtho
From: wtho@cgcha.UUCP (Tom Hofmann)
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: Re: Why troff?
Message-ID: <309@cgcha.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Feb-87 04:54:43 EST
Article-I.D.: cgcha.309
Posted: Thu Feb  5 04:54:43 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Feb-87 15:10:54 EST
References: <362@linus.UUCP> <106@tg.UUCP> <485@bobkat.UUCP>
Distribution: comp.text
Organization: CIBA-GEIGY AG, FO/WIRZ/WRZ, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
Lines: 13
Keywords: TeX, troff
Summary: TeX does more

In article <485@bobkat.UUCP>, m5d@bobkat.UUCP (Mike McNally ) writes:
> I am certain, however,
> that TeX output looks better.  It is clear to me that TeX works
> much harder than troff at setting paragraphs nicely.  In fact, I think
> that troff just does line-at-a-time justification (I could be wrong).

You are right, one main advantage of TeX is that it breaks whole
paragraphs, not only lines, and uses many parameters to do that.
(You can modify them, if necessary.) So TeX does indeed typesetting,
and not only word processing (like troff).

Tom Hofmann, Scientific Computer Center, CIBA-GEIGY AG, Basle, Switzerland
UUCP: ...!mcvax!cernvax!cgcha!wtho