Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: ulimit considered braindamaged ?
Message-ID: <5542@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 20-Jan-87 04:24:02 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.5542
Posted: Tue Jan 20 04:24:02 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Jan-87 23:26:39 EST
References: <790@maynard.BSW.COM> <7531@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 12

In article <7531@utzoo.UUCP> henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes:
-> ...  Any idea whether it will
-> be any more expensive for a commercial upgrade from 2.0 to 3.1
-> than from 2.0 to 3.0?
-Silly question, Doug -- when you ask AT&T "will <new> be more expensive
-than <old>?", the answer is invariably "yes"!  :-)

The reason I am concerned is that $22K is already approaching the
limit for relatively simple procurement for many organizations.
If the amount crosses the $25K line, it may actually generate
less revenue for AT&T, not more.  (Not that I want to maximize
AT&T profits, but I would like to be able to get the upgrade.)