Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cbmvax!vu-vlsi!devon!paul
From: paul@devon.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: ulimit considered braindamaged ?
Message-ID: <218@devon.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Feb-87 08:33:18 EST
Article-I.D.: devon.218
Posted: Thu Feb  5 08:33:18 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Feb-87 19:37:35 EST
References: <790@maynard.BSW.COM> <5486@brl-smoke.ARPA> <132@tdi2.UUCP> <1343@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Organization: Devon Computer Services, Allentown, PA
Lines: 24

In article <1343@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>, grr@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (George Robbins)
writes:
> A number of "System III" ports are actually 7th Edition ports with some of
> the newer S III system calls added.  Zilog's Zeus, and I believe non Sys V
> Xenix fall into this category.  Zeus implements the ulimit system call, but
> the disk limit part of it is a no-op.

Actually, Xenix V (Microsoft and SCO) are also V7 ports with sys3 and
sys5 system calls added.  (Microsoft originally ported V7 UN*X to form
their Xenix 2.x; they probably just built on that for 3.0 and sys V).
For instance, Xenix V/286 still has /etc/ttys and /etc/ttytype (no
/etc/inittab).  The uucp is even V7 based.  But it does have semiphores
(as does Xenix 3.0), shared mem calls, etc.

What I'd like to see is a _REAL_ Sys V Xenix!!!  (I heard rumors that
something like this was seen at UniForum).

- paul@devon.UUCP

-- 
Paul Sutcliffe, Jr.	    paul@devon.UUCP	(or, if you prefer:)
Devon Computer Services	    {seismo,ihnp4,allegra,rutgers}!cbmvax!devon!paul
Allentown, PA
		"I love work.  I could sit and watch people do it all day!"