Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cuae2!ihnp4!ptsfa!lll-lcc!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!hpcea!hpda!hpirs!lkc
From: lkc@hpirs.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Time for 64-bit longs?
Message-ID: <4760005@hpirs.HP.COM>
Date: Mon, 9-Feb-87 17:28:53 EST
Article-I.D.: hpirs.4760005
Posted: Mon Feb  9 17:28:53 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Feb-87 15:31:38 EST
References: <848@epimass.UUCP>
Lines: 14

In article <12441@sun.uucp> guy@sun.UUCP (Guy Harris) writes:
> >>And will the future 128-byte pointer be a "long long long" ? 
> 
> main ()
> {
> 	reallybig	i;
> }

That will lead to the 256-bye pointer:

main ()
{
    long reallybig	i;
}