Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!mordor!styx!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!EDDIE.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: mod.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: All this KBS
Message-ID: <8701240522.AA02821@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 24-Jan-87 00:22:35 EST
Article-I.D.: EDDIE.8701240522.AA02821
Posted: Sat Jan 24 00:22:35 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Jan-87 09:37:11 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 20
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: nessus (Doug Alan)

> From: rhr@osupyr.UUCP (Robert Robinson)

> I tried so hard to see what you see, (even got hold of a concert
> videotape, the Experiment V video, and the Running Up That Hill
> video), but it's just not there. As a singer, she's marginal at
> best, and as a redefining force, nonexistant.

C'mon!  Get a brain!  Anyone who would say that "Kate Bush it at best
a marginal singer" is either just trying to be argumentative or is
brain-dead.  And there are enough famous musicians who say that Kate
Bush is a redefining force to make her one.

No one is saying that you have to like her music, but at this point it
is close to undeniable that her music *is* great.  And we don't love
Kate as just a "singer".  She's also a fantastic composer, lyricist,
keyboardist, producer, coreographer, video designer and director, etc.

			|>oug