Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!videovax.tek.com!stever
From: stever@videovax.tek.com.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Submission for mod-protocols-tcp-ip
Message-ID: <8701161741.AA24750@videovax.TEK>
Date: Fri, 16-Jan-87 12:41:20 EST
Article-I.D.: videovax.8701161741.AA24750
Posted: Fri Jan 16 12:41:20 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Jan-87 01:47:23 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 34
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa

Path: videovax!stever
From: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.)
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Analyzing Acknowledgement Strategies
Summary: Please continue to let us in on the discussion!
Message-ID: <4160@videovax.Tek.COM>
Date: 16 Jan 87 17:41:18 GMT
References: <8701151850.AA18157@lbl-csam.arpa>
Reply-To: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.)
Organization: Tektronix Television Systems, Beaverton, Oregon
Lines: 22

In article <8701151850.AA18157@lbl-csam.arpa>, Van Jacobson
(van@LBL-CSAM.ARPA) writes:

> Dave -

[ body of the article deleted ]
 
>   - Van
> 
> ps- perhaps we should take this discussion off line?  I've been
>     filling up peoples' mailboxes lately and I get the impression
>     that there are only two or three of us interested in this topic.

I cannot speak for anyone but myself, but I appreciate seeing the
discussion of these issues.  I am not at present directly involved
with such networks, but the problems discussed are food for thought
and the solutions proposed have bearing in other areas.

					Steve Rice

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
{decvax | hplabs | ihnp4 | uw-beaver}!tektronix!videovax!stever