Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!videovax.tek.com!stever
From: stever@videovax.tek.com ("Steven E. Rice")
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Analyzing Acknowledgement Strategies (Second try!)
Message-ID: <8701221553.AA14115@videovax.TEK>
Date: Thu, 22-Jan-87 10:53:14 EST
Article-I.D.: videovax.8701221553.AA14115
Posted: Thu Jan 22 10:53:14 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 23-Jan-87 22:15:29 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 35
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa

The "automatic" mailing software dropped the ball, so we'll try again:

From: stever@videovax
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Analyzing Acknowledgement Strategies
Message-ID: <4160@videovax.Tek.COM>
Date: Fri, 16-Jan-87 19:41:18 EET
References: <8701151850.AA18157@lbl-csam.arpa>
Reply-To: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.)
Organization: Tektronix Television Systems, Beaverton, Oregon
Lines: 22
Summary: Please continue to let us in on the discussion!

In article <8701151850.AA18157@lbl-csam.arpa>, Van Jacobson
(van@LBL-CSAM.ARPA) writes:

> Dave -

[ body of the article deleted ]

>   - Van
>
> ps- perhaps we should take this discussion off line?  I've been
>     filling up peoples' mailboxes lately and I get the impression
>     that there are only two or three of us interested in this topic.

I cannot speak for anyone but myself, but I appreciate seeing the
discussion of these issues.  I am not at present directly involved
with such networks, but the problems discussed are food for thought
and the solutions proposed have bearing in other areas.

                                        Steve Rice

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
{decvax | hplabs | ihnp4 | uw-beaver}!tektronix!videovax!stever