Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!genat!clunk!don From: don@clunk.UUCP (Don McKillican) Newsgroups: tor.news Subject: Usenet map of Toronto Message-ID: <106@clunk.UUCP> Date: Wed, 21-Jan-87 08:50:46 EST Article-I.D.: clunk.106 Posted: Wed Jan 21 08:50:46 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 22-Jan-87 06:11:34 EST References: <1497@lsuc.UUCP> <104@clunk.UUCP> <1504@lsuc.UUCP> Organization: Antedeluvian Systems, Toronto Lines: 39 I should like to thank the few people I have heard from so far with corrections to the map I posted: rayan@utegc for the UofT stuff, and emc@unicus and david@geac for corrections. The changes will be incorporated into the next version. Clunk had a uucp seizure this past weekend, so if you've sent me something, I probably didn't receive it: please try again. Now to my critics :-). In article <1504@lsuc.UUCP>, dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) writes: > Hmm. Thanks, Don. I didn't even suggest anyone try doing > a UUCP map, because (1) pathalias can give routings and (2) > the map would be so complex. Your attempt is nice, but is > (just for example) missing lsuc's connections to parkridge, > hcr, nrcaer, toram, maccs and sickkids, First of all, both your points are perfectly correct. But I think there is room for another point of view, too. Pathalias is okay, but there are a lot of sites which don't have it, don't use it, don't keep it up to date or any combination of the above. And there are even more users who don't know how to use it. And I personally happen to like a pictorial approach better. Besides, if pathalias tries to send me through lsuc, and I happen to know that lsuc is (perish the thought!) down, then I can look on the map for an alternate path. Pathalias isn't good at that. As to the sites you name, I actually had a reason for all of them. You will recall I said in my first posting that I wanted to include only "good" paths (HOURLY or better). I grant lsuc's connection to most of the sites you name is DIRECT. However, parkridge lists lsuc as EVENING, hcr lists it as WEEKLY, maccs is DAILY/4, and toram and sickkids don't list lsuc at all. You see my dilemma. You may say this just proves your point (and it does :-)), but I think there is *some* method in my madness. I should possibly qualify "good" as meaning "HOURLY or better in both directions". Oh and I did include your connection to ncraer. Take heart :-). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don McKillican seismo!mnetor!genat!clunk!don {utcs,utai,utzoo,watmath}!lsuc!clunk!don