Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hcrvx2.UUCP Path: utzoo!hcr!hcrvx2!jimr From: jimr@hcrvx2.UUCP (Jim Robinson) Newsgroups: can.politics Subject: Re: What is Canadian culture, $$ Message-ID: <2763@hcrvx2.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Feb-87 13:55:17 EST Article-I.D.: hcrvx2.2763 Posted: Thu Feb 26 13:55:17 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Feb-87 02:16:10 EST References: <183@fornax.uucp> <840@mprvaxa.UUCP> <188@fornax.uucp> <5292@watmath.UUCP> <2751@hcrvx2.UUCP> <865@ubc-cs.UUCP> Reply-To: jimr@hcrvx2.UUCP (Jim Robinson) Distribution: can Organization: HCR Corporation, Toronto Lines: 35 Summary: In article <865@ubc-cs.UUCP> andrews@ubc-cs.UUCP (Jamie Andrews) writes: >>In article <5292@watmath.UUCP> imprint@watmath.UUCP (Imprint) WRITES: > [a definition of Canadian culture] > >In article <2751@hcrvx2.UUCP> jimr@hcrvx2.UUCP (Jim Robinson) writes: > ["why would free trade change any of this?"] > > My old friend JBR has once again missed the point entirely. >We were talking about how including the media in free trade would >make the American media and culture more influential in Canada. >The response (from him among others) was "who cares, American >culture is so similar to Canadian that it wouldn't matter anyway, >right?" So the responses have been definitions of Canadian >culture and its distinctness from American culture. Once again my old Beer Garden buddy, Jamie, has chosen to distort what I was saying. I *never* claimed that there were no major differences between Canadian and American culture. What I did say was, basically, that I would rather, on my own volition, adopt American culture, if I so desired, than have Canadian culture *forced* on me by a bunch of bogon-flux sources in Ottawa. If the Canadian people make such a choice voluntarily then who are you to say they're wrong. > Now he seems to be admitting that there are differences but >now also arguing that the massive influx of American media would >not affect Canadian culture in this way. I think he either forgot >his previous position or is just retreating to what he thinks (in >his foolishness :-)) is a more tenable position. To be precise, what I said was that the only changes I foresee is that we'd no longer have the opportunity to watch (and subsidize) wonderful Canadian movies such as "My Bloody Valentine" and "Shivers". A loss that suits me fine. J.B. Robinson