Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!styx!lll-lcc!ptsfa!ihnp4!homxb!houxm!mtuxo!mtune!ariel!caelum!io!granjon!daimler!bocar!bearcat!pierce!cord!erc3bb!erc3ba!occrsh!occrsh.UUCP!tiger.UUCP!authorplaceholder
From: authorplaceholder@tiger.UUCP.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Re.: Ingres vs Informix
Message-ID: <143900001@tiger.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Mar-87 13:10:00 EST
Article-I.D.: tiger.143900001
Posted: Wed Mar 11 13:10:00 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Mar-87 23:24:49 EST
References: <1207@ihlpf.ATT.COM>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:ihlpf.ATT.COM:-120700:tiger.UUCP:143900001:000:227
Nf-From: tiger.UUCP!jlm    Mar 11 12:10:00 1987




Ingres 5.0 may indeed be faster, but does anybody care about concurrency?

If so, the page/table level locking of Ingres will still disappoint you
on the "speed" of multi-user operations requiring snap-shots of large
tables.