Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!hscfvax!pavlov
From: pavlov@hscfvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Re.: Ingres vs Informix
Message-ID: <346@hscfvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Mar-87 01:13:51 EST
Article-I.D.: hscfvax.346
Posted: Fri Mar 13 01:13:51 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Mar-87 00:56:49 EST
References: <1207@ihlpf.ATT.COM> <143900001@tiger.UUCP>
Organization: Health Sciences Computing Facility, Harvard University
Lines: 12

In article <143900001@tiger.UUCP>, authorplaceholder@tiger.UUCP.UUCP writes:
> 
> Ingres 5.0 may indeed be faster, but does anybody care about concurrency?
> If so, the page/table level locking of Ingres will still disappoint you
> on the "speed" of multi-user operations requiring snap-shots of large
> tables.

  Do you have any examples of executions/timings (particularly in comparison to
  other dbms's) that you can pass on to us ?  I would be interested in seeing
  them.

     thanks, greg pavlov, fstrf, amherst, ny