Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!mtune!mtuxo!houxm!homxb!hrs
From: hrs@homxb.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Migent Pocket Modem (query)
Message-ID: <2410@homxb.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Feb-87 08:51:39 EST
Article-I.D.: homxb.2410
Posted: Tue Feb 24 08:51:39 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Feb-87 20:38:23 EST
References: <327@uhccux.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel
Lines: 23
Keywords: portable modem Migent Worldlink
Xref: utgpu comp.sys.ibm.pc:1938 comp.dcom.modems:306
Summary: Pocket Modem Comparisons

> Hayes 1200 compatible modems.  After looking at both the
> 
> 	WorldLink 1200
> and the
> 	Migent Pocket Modem
> 
> his comment was that the Migent seems like a better buy.  His reasons were
> the Migent seems more sturdily constructed, comes with good documentation,
> and the support staff at Migent are knowledgeable and helpful.
> 

I was in the market for a 1200 modem for my Trash 100, and called
Migent fro information.  They promised to send me material (in 
December). I did not receive any.!

I chose the WorldLink,  it was recommended by a user friend, but also
because it support the CCITT V. series as well as the Bell
protocols. Since I travel overseas, this is a big advantage.

I have used it to call a number of machines, and it works
very well.

Herman Silbiger ihnp4!homxb!hrs