Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!ptsfa!lll-lcc!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!husc6!endor!bryant
From: bryant@endor.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Emacs 18.37
Message-ID: <1309@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Feb-87 15:51:36 EST
Article-I.D.: husc6.1309
Posted: Thu Feb 26 15:51:36 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Feb-87 06:42:33 EST
References: <842@cullvax.UUCP>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: bryant@endor.UUCP (jim bryant)
Organization: harvard university, aiken computer lab
Lines: 20

In article <842@cullvax.UUCP> drw@cullvax.UUCP (Dale Worley) writes:
>gore@nucsrl.UUCP (Jacob Gore) writes:
>>When I use "M-x shell", all control-characters sent during the communication
>>with the inferior shell (including ^M) get put into the buffer.  Is there any
>>way to avoid this?
> 
> I suppose you could hack the code in Emacs that receives the output of
> the shell and stuffs it in the buffer to ignore ^M, if you've got a
> lot of programs that produce ^M^J for newline.  But what do you want
> to do with the other control characters?

we don't get any of the control characters in emacs shells on the
machines at the harvard science center, and i don't think they hacked
the code to relieve the problem.

harvard university/graduate school of arts & sciences/jim bryant -k6
... ihnp4!think!harvard!bryant    bryant@harvard.harvard.edu
--
do not want to die for us, do not want to live for us: live with us.
- ryszard krynicki