Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!ukc!warwick!gordon
From: gordon@warwick.UUCP (Gordon Joly)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: MS-DOS GNU, and CP/M, and MicroGNU.
Message-ID: <418@euclid.warwick.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 14-Mar-87 15:48:59 EST
Article-I.D.: euclid.418
Posted: Sat Mar 14 15:48:59 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 16-Mar-87 04:09:46 EST
References: <8702261532.AA25127@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> <1033@cartan.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: gordon@warwick.UUCP (Gordon Joly)
Organization: Maths Institute, Warwick University, UK
Lines: 25
Keywords: not MS-DOS + MicroEmacs 3.8b

In article <699@rtech.UUCP> daveb@rtech.UUCP (Dave Brower) writes:
>
>[...]
>I do know what I'm talking about, microemacs in the three flavors I know
>will not run reasonably on CP/M-80 (which is what I said originally).
>Nowhere did I say anything about MSDOS or CP/M-86.
>
>As should be clear from the header file quoted in this unthoughtful reply,
>CP/M-86 is supported just fine.  Most any x86 has the memory to support it.
>You do not have enough with a 60K TPA on CP/M-80.  That's what I said,
>and that's what I meant.
>
>Informed flames burn.  This is just aggravating.
>
>-dB
>-- 
>
>{amdahl, sun, mtxinu, cbosgd}!rtech!daveb

Apologies to Dave and the net. The tone of my flame indicated my
lack of expertise, I hope. There had been so many comments asking
`does this version run on that machine' that I got well confused.

Sorry again,
Gordon Joly -- {seismo,ucbvax,decvax}!mcvax!ukc!warwiby c@syNOT