Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ll-xn!cullvax!drw
From: drw@cullvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: arrays vs. pointers
Message-ID: <904@cullvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Mar-87 19:15:21 EST
Article-I.D.: cullvax.904
Posted: Wed Mar 11 19:15:21 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Mar-87 00:05:39 EST
Organization: Cullinet Software, Inc., Westwood, MA
Lines: 27

bill@voodoo.UUCP (Bill Sears) writes:
> in decl.c:
> 	char Big_buf[512];
> 
> in main.c
> 	main()
> 	    {
> 	    extern char *Big_buf;
> 	    int i;
> 
> 	    for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
> 		*(Big_buf + i) = 0;
> 	    }

The linker should, ideally, reject this.  If you want to say "extern
char *Big_buf" then you have to say "char *Big_buf" where you define
it.  What you should say is "extern char Big_buf[]".  Your second
example (where both defintion and reference were in the second file)
is probably invalid under any reasonably tight definition of the
language, but you compiler happens to let you get away with it.

Dale
-- 
Dale Worley		Cullinet Software
UUCP: ...!seismo!harvard!mit-eddie!cullvax!drw
ARPA: cullvax!drw@eddie.mit.edu
Un*x (a generic name for a class of OS's) != Unix (AT&T's brand of such)