Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!labrea!su-russell!wade
From: wade@su-russell.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: autoload (was: Re: Against the Tide of Common LISP)
Message-ID: <253@su-russell.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 18-Feb-87 03:31:20 EST
Article-I.D.: su-russe.253
Posted: Wed Feb 18 03:31:20 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Feb-87 19:00:20 EST
Organization: Stanford University, CSLI
Lines: 5

I see no reason to support autoloading in a system which supports a
decent implementation of virtual memory (UNIX does not fall into this
class). A good virtual memory implementation completely subsumes
autoloading by keeping only what you are likely to need in your
working set (this ignores the cost of page table size, etc.).