Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!kaiser!tla
From: tla@kaiser.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: FYI: M2 Comments
Message-ID: <568@kaiser.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Mar-87 11:20:13 EST
Article-I.D.: kaiser.568
Posted: Fri Mar 13 11:20:13 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Mar-87 09:38:19 EST
References: <8703101615.AA14931@frey.olsen.uucp>
Distribution: world
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Liberty Corner
Lines: 46


>	Did any language implementers out there ever notice that 
>	Wirth does not define the syntax of a "comment" in the 
>	"Syntax of Modula-2" in the back of PIM2. They don't 
>	appear in the railroad diagrams, either. He mentions 
>	them on page 16 (3rd edition), but even there he
>	doesn't mention that they can be nested.  I realized this 
>	after playing with EBNF for some language stuff and found 
>	it very difficult to describe "arbitrary sequences of 
>	characters" in EBNF.
>
>	My question is: "Was it an oversight or was it intentionally
>	avoided?"
>
>	Rob
>
>	PS. Don't bother looking in the index, they aren't mentioned 
>	there.

There is one more reference, (ed 3) page 145, where it IS stated that
comments CAN be nested.  And both ARE in my index under "comment".  
You may have missed it because of its being in the second column 
or maybe is was missing from the older first printing (mine is the
"Third, corrected edition".  

I find the odd ordering of the index annoying ie
	a	b
	c	d
	e	f
rather than 
	a	d
	b	e
	c	f
The columns are toooo far apart for the first ordering to 
be easy to use.  Does anyone LIKE it?

Back to comments, I imagine they are missing from the syntax
(both EBNF and railroad) because they are not considered a part
of the "language" ie they are removed and replaced by white space
during lexical analysis and not seen by the parser.

			     --	Terry L Anderson
				AT&T Bell Laboratories -- Liberty Corners
				UUCP:     ...!ihnp4!daimler!kaiser!tla
				TeleMail: Terry.Anderson
				(201) 580-4428