Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!princeton!allegra!ulysses!faline!sabre!zeta!mb2c!fmsrl7!cideq3!jeff
From: jeff@cideq3.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: My gawd...
Message-ID: <204@cideq3.CIDNET.COM>
Date: Sat, 21-Feb-87 21:50:22 EST
Article-I.D.: cideq3.204
Posted: Sat Feb 21 21:50:22 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Feb-87 16:24:53 EST
References: <1061@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu> <394@stracs.cs.strath.ac.uk>
Reply-To: jeff@cideq3.UUCP (Jeff Marraccini)
Distribution: world
Organization: CID Public Access Xenix, Clarkston, MI
Lines: 20

In article <394@stracs.cs.strath.ac.uk> jim@cs.strath.ac.uk writes:
>Oh, that it were true! What proportion of sites on USENET are stuck with
>V7-style mailers that can only cope with UUCP bang-style addresses? They
>won't comply with RFC822 and I doubt if many of them could become RFC822
>compliant even if they wanted to. [Anybody fancy putting sendmail or MMDF
>up on a XENIX box with a 20 Mbyte disk? :-)] 

I don't have sendmail or MMDF running, but smail version 2.3 seems to run
just fine on my Xenix 2.1.3 system (and it's on a 20mb disk! :-). Seriously,
smail does at least generate the proper headers, and it didn't take very
long to install.

Send e-mail if you want the installation procedure - but please make sure
your message has RFC822 headers so I can reply! :-)

-- 
Jeff Marraccini	- cideq3 System Administrator     | cideq3: Public Access Xenix
UUCP:     ...!ihnp4!mb2c!fmsrl7!cideq3!jeff       | 313/623-6309, 1200/2400 bps
INTERNET: jeff@cideq3.cidnet.com                  | Login with 'help' for info.
PHONE:    +1 313 623 7115                         |____________________________