Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!pyramid!amdahl!krs
From: krs@amdahl.UUCP (Kris Stephens)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.misc,rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Value of Mac SE for Electronic Music Composition
Message-ID: <5821@amdahl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Mar-87 16:34:17 EST
Article-I.D.: amdahl.5821
Posted: Fri Mar  6 16:34:17 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Mar-87 07:35:34 EST
References: <404@atux01.UUCP>
Reply-To: krs@amdahl.UUCP (Kris Stephens)
Organization: Amdahl Corp, Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 25
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.mac:1647 comp.misc:315 rec.music.synth:433

In article <404@atux01.UUCP> jlc@atux01.UUCP (J. Collymore) writes:
>
>I have made up my mind that I want to get a Macintosh computer to use in
>my electronic music system.  I will have loaded into it both Opcode's
>MIDIMAC Sequencer 2.5, and Electronic Arts' Deluxe Music Construction Set
>(DMCS).  I also will want to give it a patch librarian to store new patches.
>
>With this in mind, I am deciding on whether to buy a Mac Plus, or the newer,
>double-floppy drive, Mac SE.

Jim...

   I'm quite happy with the combination of a MacPlus, Performer,
Professional Composer, and an internal HyperDrive.  The internal
HD obviates the requirement for a second floppy drive (for me,
anyhow) - in fact, I've loaned my external drive to a friend.
I haven't considered the SE, because I'm already in with a Plus,
but I'd thought I'd post that I *am* happy with what I've got.

...Kris
-- 
Kristopher Stephens, | (408-746-6047) |          {whatever}!amdahl!krs
Amdahl Corporation   |                |    -or-  krs@amdahl.amdahl.com
     [The opinions expressed above are mine, solely, and do not    ]
     [necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of Amdahl Corp. ]