Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe
From: keithe@tekgvs.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,news.groups
Subject: Re: minix program postings to the net
Message-ID: <2099@tekgvs.TEK.COM>
Date: Wed, 18-Feb-87 20:34:24 EST
Article-I.D.: tekgvs.2099
Posted: Wed Feb 18 20:34:24 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Feb-87 02:08:09 EST
References: <962@osiris.UUCP> <7619@utzoo.UUCP> <468@gouldsd.UUCP> <744@bucsb.bu.edu.UUCP> <631@brl-sem.ARPA>
Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.UUCP (Keith Ericson)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR.
Lines: 15
Xref: utgpu comp.os.minix:311 news.groups:387

In article <631@brl-sem.ARPA> ron@brl-sem.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>)
writes [in comp.os.minix]:
>There isn't any point in posting binaries to this group.

Agreed.

But since lots of (IBM and compatible) PC's and AT's around the world
are gonna' be running Minix, might it be reasonable to form something
like "comp.os.minix.pc" and maybe "comp.os.minix.<whatever>" as well?

And if so, where do we go from here? (Note: followups go to news.groups
for discussion. Let's keep new administration questions and discussions
OUT of comp.os.minix, ok?)

keith