Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!unirot!ron
From: ron@unirot.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: minix program postings to the net
Message-ID: <351@unirot.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Feb-87 13:51:59 EST
Article-I.D.: unirot.351
Posted: Sun Feb 22 13:51:59 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 23-Feb-87 02:40:40 EST
References: <962@osiris.UUCP> <7619@utzoo.UUCP> <468@gouldsd.UUCP> <2106@ncoast.UUCP>
Organization: Public Access Unix, Piscataway, NJ
Lines: 12

In article <2106@ncoast.UUCP>, allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery) writes:
> Except that you don't get the C compiler used to compile MINIX originally.
> If Sep I/D is used by some MINIX programs, and the native compiler doesn't
> support split I/D, you're stuck, no?  (Of course, you can always pay even
> more for the compiler that *does* support it.  Foo.)
> -- 
You can't fault AST for not giving away a C compiler that isn't his.  It's
only a matter of time before someone fixes the Minix ACK compiler to handle
the split model.  Meanwhile, there are instructions in the book on how to
recompile these programs using the non-MINIX compilers.

-Ron