Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!carr
From: carr@convex.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.periphs
Subject: Re: Fuji Super Eagle Problems
Message-ID: <64700002@convex>
Date: Tue, 10-Mar-87 13:52:00 EST
Article-I.D.: convex.64700002
Posted: Tue Mar 10 13:52:00 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Mar-87 21:57:10 EST
References: <269@fathom.UUCP>
Lines: 13
Nf-ID: #R:fathom.UUCP:269:convex:64700002:000:475
Nf-From: convex.UUCP!carr    Mar 10 12:52:00 1987


>Yes, these are the Fujitsu 2344's.  SI seemed to be willing to pass out
>info.  Capacity is the same as the 2351 (Eagle) but seek time is faster

Wrong. The Fuji 2344 has an unformatted capacity of 690.10 Mb. The 2351's is
around 474 Mb.

>heads he claimed).  Since the Super Eagle and the 2344 both use thin film
>technology, he thinks the same problem will crop up in 2344.  Could be

Wrong again. Both drives use good old oxide media.

Rob Carruthers {ihnp4!convex!carr}