Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!masscomp!ulowell!page
From: page@ulowell.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,news.groups
Subject: Re: moderation in moderation....
Message-ID: <1065@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu>
Date: Tue, 17-Feb-87 00:15:50 EST
Article-I.D.: ulowell.1065
Posted: Tue Feb 17 00:15:50 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Feb-87 19:19:28 EST
References: <3459@garfield.UUCP> <5663@amdahl.UUCP> <2532@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: page@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu (Bob Page)
Followup-To: /dev/null
Organization: University of Lowell
Lines: 32
Summary: publicly flaunting mild annoyance
Xref: watmath comp.sys.amiga:2119 news.groups:362

In article <5663@amdahl.UUCP> kim@amdahl.UUCP (Kim DeVaughn) writes:
>Most recently, Mike Meyer sent something to Purdue for moderated posting

Then mwm@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (No one lives forever.) Meyer) wrote:
>I suspect that the problem is that ulowell does _not_ have a reliable
>connection to the outside world.

How did we start talking about ulowell?  Didn't you mail it to purdue?

Heat on.  This is for Mike but everyone needs to know the facts.

For the record, ulowell _does_ have a reliable connection to the
outside world.  Several of them, thank you.  Maybe purdue doesn't ?

>I just changed all the ulowell.csnet entries in info-68k to !ulowell!

That's your decision.

>because UUCP is more reliable than their CSNET connection. Gag.

CSNET works, it's just been slower in some cases over the past two
months, and should be faster in most cases now.  We never had any
_reliability_ problems, however.

Use whatever path you want.  ulowell.edu is preferred - why are you
specifying routing?

Heat off.  How's your Amiga?  How about that new Amiga 2000!

..Bob
-- 
Bob Page,  U of Lowell CS Dept.      ulowell!page,  page@ulowell.CSNET