Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!tekgen!tekigm!tekigm2!phils From: phils@tekigm2.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: moderation in moderation.... Message-ID: <1488@tekigm2.TEK.COM> Date: Tue, 17-Feb-87 14:20:33 EST Article-I.D.: tekigm2.1488 Posted: Tue Feb 17 14:20:33 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Feb-87 06:02:37 EST References: <3459@garfield.UUCP> <5663@amdahl.UUCP> <2532@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <1065@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu> Reply-To: phils@tekigm2.UUCP (Philip E Staub) Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 87 In article <1065@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu> page@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu (Bob Page) writes: >In article <5663@amdahl.UUCP> kim@amdahl.UUCP (Kim DeVaughn) writes: >>Most recently, Mike Meyer sent something to Purdue for moderated posting > >Then mwm@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (No one lives forever.) Meyer) wrote: >>I suspect that the problem is that ulowell does _not_ have a reliable >>connection to the outside world. > >How did we start talking about ulowell? Didn't you mail it to purdue? > >Heat on. This is for Mike but everyone needs to know the facts. > >For the record, ulowell _does_ have a reliable connection to the >outside world. Several of them, thank you. Maybe purdue doesn't ? > ... > >..Bob >-- >Bob Page, U of Lowell CS Dept. ulowell!page, page@ulowell.CSNET Today I received some return mail indicating that a reply I had send to ulowell had not been delivered in 5 days. Does this maybe indicate that ulowell's connection to the outside world is somewhat less reliable than Bob believes? Particularly in light of the statement Bob makes later in this article that ulowell.edu is the preferred path. (No flames here, just wanting to point out a (perhaps non-unique) problem) This is the returned text: Begin quote mode: (Message inbox:100) Received: from tektronix.tek.com (tektronix.TEK) by tekigm2.TEK.COM (1.2/6.19) id AA19539; Tue, 17 Feb 87 06:44:47 PST Message-Id: <8702171444.AA19539@tekigm2.TEK.COM> Received: from csnet-relay by tektronix.tektronix.TEK.COM id a012574; 17 Feb 87 6:44 PST Date: Tue, 17 Feb 87 6:49:45 EST From: RELAY Mail System (MMDF) Sender: mmdf@relay.cs.net Subject: Waiting mail (msg.as19183) To: phils@tekigm2.TEK.COM After 5 days (110 hours), your message has not yet been fully delivered. Attempts to deliver the message will continue for 2 more days. No further action is required by you. Delivery attempts are still pending for the following address(es): mod-amiga@ulowell.edu (host: ulowell.edu) (queue: ulowell) Problems usually are due to service interruptions at the receiving machine. Less often, they are caused by the communication system. Your message begins as follows: Received: from tektronix.tek.com by RELAY.CS.NET id as19183; 12 Feb 87 15:45 EST Received: by tektronix.TEK.COM (5.31/6.19) id AA26080; Thu, 12 Feb 87 11:13:44 PST Received: by tekigm2.TEK.COM (1.2/6.19) id AA19362; Thu, 12 Feb 87 11:09:29 PST From: Philip E Staub Message-Id: <8702121909.AA19362@tekigm2.TEK.COM> Date: 12 Feb 87 19:09:27 GMT To: mod-amiga@tektronix.TEK.COM Subject: Submission for mod-amiga Responding-System: tekigm2.TEK.COM Path: tekigm2!phils From: phils@tekigm2.TEK.COM (Philip E Staub) ... End quote mode. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Staub tektronix!tekigm!phils (206) 253-5634 Tektronix, Inc., ISI Engineering P.O.Box 3500, M/S C1-904, Vancouver, Washington 98668 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Staub tektronix!tekigm!phils (206) 253-5634 Tektronix, Inc., ISI Engineering P.O.Box 3500, M/S C1-904, Vancouver, Washington 98668