Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!husc4!grunau_b From: grunau_b@husc4.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: A few questions Message-ID: <1265@husc6.UUCP> Date: Thu, 19-Feb-87 20:17:48 EST Article-I.D.: husc6.1265 Posted: Thu Feb 19 20:17:48 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 20-Feb-87 22:22:43 EST References: <2373@sunybcs.UUCP> <1441@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Sender: news@husc6.UUCP Reply-To: grunau_b@husc4.UUCP (Justin J. M. Grunau) Organization: Harvard Science Center Lines: 37 In order to provide a more direct answer to the original question "does SCSI mean IBM compatability?", the answer is emphatically "No, they are apples and oranges". Some PC-DOS machines are no doubt equipped with SCSI boards, but whether or not something has SCSI compatability has no bearing on whether it is IBM compatible (or even Mac compatible, and Macs DO have SCSI ports). SCSI is an interface standard, like RS-232 (serial) and Centronix (parallel). It is the high-speed interface, with a standard throughput of 10Mbits/sec (1.25MBytes/sec). It stands for "small computer system interface" and is a fixture of expensive workstations like Suns; it descended from something called SASI for these types of machines. When something is SCSI compatible, that means (1) it could very well be a very fast port, good for hard disks, and (2) you can attach to it up to seven devices that can be talked to in a standard SCSI protocol, and are not restricted to manufacturers that know how to make devices attachable to your specific machine and only your specific machine. BTW: the Mac's SCSI port has a throughput of only 320KBytes/sec -- about one- quarter the standard; I do not know what the explanation of this is. And the Atari ST's DMA port, which does support 10Mbits/sec, is supposed to be quasi- SCSI-standard, though how quasi I am not sure. grunau@husc4.UUCP or --- !seismo----- \ --- !rutgers----- !husc6!husc4!grunau / --- !decvax!ihnp4 or For BITNET, I believe the hostname is "harvard".