Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!pyramid!voder!apple!lsr
From: lsr@apple.UUCP (Larry Rosenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: New Macs
Message-ID: <516@apple.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Mar-87 20:26:56 EST
Article-I.D.: apple.516
Posted: Fri Mar  6 20:26:56 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Mar-87 09:51:49 EST
References: <8703051939.AA24035@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: lsr@apple.UUCP (Larry Rosenstein)
Organization: Advanced Technology Group, Apple Computer
Lines: 11

In article <8703051939.AA24035@cory.Berkeley.EDU> dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes:
>	From what I hear, the Mac II is 4 times faster than the Mac+. The Mac+
>is about half as fast as the Amiga due to video refresh.  Thus, the Mac II is
>only twice as fast as a vanila Amiga.  
>

I doubt that an Amiga is twice as fast as a Mac Plus; 20% is more like it.
(The Mac SE, which has improved video hardware is about 20% faster than a
Mac Plus, and I assume that a Mac SE and Amiga are comartouli vai!hair