Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcnc!ece-csc!ncrcae!ncr-sd!bigbang!crash!billd
From: billd@crash.CTS.COM (Bill D'Camp)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: New Macs
Message-ID: <874@crash.CTS.COM>
Date: Fri, 6-Mar-87 18:21:32 EST
Article-I.D.: crash.874
Posted: Fri Mar  6 18:21:32 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Mar-87 11:31:30 EST
References: <MS.V3.18.cb29.80021115.gettysburg.ibm032.131.0@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: billd@crash.CTS.COM (Bill D'Camp)
Organization: Crash TS, El Cajon, CA
Lines: 32

In article <MS.V3.18.cb29.80021115.gettysburg.ibm032.131.0@andrew.cmu.edu> cb29#@andrew.cmu.edu (Chad Kavanaugh Bisk) writes:
>Mike -
>
>	How can you say the Amiga 1000 (or even the 2000) is a better
>machine?!?
>The Mac II moves almost 4 times as fast!  They can put a software coded,
>multi-tasking op-system in there and it'll still run 2 to 3 times as fast.
>
>	Oh when is the A3000 going to come out with a real 68020?
>
>			-- Chad
Yeah, and only pay four times as much, the bare bones Mac II is supposed to
start at $4800 without monitor or hard disk.  What a bargain!

I hope this doesn't start a "my currently nonexistent machine is better
than your currently nonexistent machine" war.


-- 
    _   /|
    \`o_O'
      ( )    Aachk! Phft!
       U

(serious self-portrait?)

Opinion?  I thought you said onions.


UUCP:	{akqua,hplabs!hp-sdd,sdcsvax,nosc}crash!billd
ARPA:	crash!billd@nosc
INET:	billd@crash.CTS.COM