Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!rochester!kodak!elmgate!jdg
From: jdg@elmgate.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: A patch to a compiler I haven't got!
Message-ID: <580@elmgate.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Mar-87 12:34:33 EST
Article-I.D.: elmgate.580
Posted: Wed Mar 11 12:34:33 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Mar-87 20:12:03 EST
References: <1982@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <2740@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: jdg@aurora.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky)
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga
Organization: Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY
Lines: 29
Summary: Complaining about Manx

In article <2740@well.UUCP> manx@well.UUCP (Jim Goodnow II) writes:
>A bug in the 3.4a compiler which was found when compiling vt100 vers 2.6
>is fixed by the following patch program which will be updated if and when
>any other bugs are reported.
>

I was just going to sit patiently and wait for my 3.40a Commercial
version to arrive. After all, I've been patient since March 1986.
But I'm afraid this patch blew a fuse is my head.
Yeah, I know, many will be sure I never had a fuse....or head..

I paid 500 some odd bucks 13 monthes ago for a compiler. Good one, not
great, but good,  and waited for updates.  And waited, and waited, and
waited, and waited, and waited, and waited, and waited, and waited,
and.... you get the idea.

Now I'm  getting patches for a compiler that, as far as I can tell, does 
NOT exist!   Gimme a break!
What are the odds that I receive the 3.4 update (within this decade)
that has the patch already installed?  Damn slim I'll bet (on both
counts).

Sheesh................

-- 
Jeff Gortatowsky       {seismo,allegra}!rochester!kodak!elmgate!jdg
Eastman Kodak Company  
These comments are mine alone and not Eastman Kodak's. How's that for a
simple and complete disclaimer?