Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ukma!ukecc!timothy From: timothy@ukecc.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Commodore 128 Emulation (was: thoughts...Ranger...) Message-ID: <1241@ukecc.uky.edu> Date: Wed, 11-Mar-87 15:43:31 EST Article-I.D.: ukecc.1241 Posted: Wed Mar 11 15:43:31 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 13-Mar-87 02:18:43 EST References: <140@tahoma.UUCP> <158@rocky.STANFORD.EDU> <1513@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <2725@well.UUCP> Sender: news@ukecc.uky.edu Reply-To: timothy@ukecc.UUCP (Timothy W. Williams) Distribution: world Organization: University of Kentucky ---> dormitory of Holmes Lines: 23 In article <2725@well.UUCP> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes: > > Really? You think so? The fastest I've ever seen those things >commercially is 2 MHz. The C-64 runs at (slightly less than) 1 MHz. After >moving to the 68K, the very THOUGHT of going back to the 6502 makes me gag. CORRECTION: slightly GREATER than 1 MHz... actually 1.023... and it is a 6510, (I know... BIG DEAL!!!) The 6510 is an upgrade of the 6502 (more efficient). I say we go all the way and emulate the 128!! then we can have "the best of Commodore" all in one machine! (Well, when we add the SuperPet, too ;-). Does anyone think we could actually Emulate a 128? Then we would HAVE the 64, CP/M, and native 128!!! "Imagination is more important than intelligence." Albert E. -- Timothy W. Williams