Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!dayton!meccts!viper!john
From: john@viper.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Compiler Question
Message-ID: <561@viper.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 21-Feb-87 14:11:14 EST
Article-I.D.: viper.561
Posted: Sat Feb 21 14:11:14 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Feb-87 05:38:14 EST
References: <1264@husc6.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@viper.UUCP (John Stanley)
Organization: DynaSoft Systems
Lines: 20

In article <1264@husc6.UUCP> grunau_b@husc4.UUCP (Justin J. M. Grunau) writes:
 >
 >I have two simple compiler questions:
 >   ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 >
 >	(b) about ANSI compatability -- are there any compilers out there that
 >	    are fully ANSI-standard, or at least as much as Lattice or
 >	    Microsoft C are for the IBM?  Which compiler(s) have the most
 >	    ANSI extensions?  In particular, is Lattice fully extended (e.g.
 >	    passable structures/arrays, fully-specified function declarations
 >	    [with a typelist for the parameters], enum and void types, and
 >	    concatenatable strings)?
 >

  ("Simple" eh?  I'd hate to see what he's got in his "hard questions" list.)

  I hate to break this to you Justin, but there is no ANSI standard for C
(yet).  As soon as they (the standards group) get their act together and
and the standard is published ask your question again and, -then- you might
get an answer....