Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!ulysses!gatech!cuae2!wucs1!wucs2!cec2!drk7956
From: drk7956@cec2.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: >'s and disinformation
Message-ID: <2286@cec2.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 21-Feb-87 19:23:08 EST
Article-I.D.: cec2.2286
Posted: Sat Feb 21 19:23:08 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 23-Feb-87 02:33:45 EST
References: <870218233112.027926@RADC-MULTICS.ARPA>
Reply-To: drk7956@cec2.UUCP (David R Kohr)
Followup-To: Discussion about reply articles.
Organization: Washington U. in St. Louis
Lines: 17
Keywords: No way.
Summary: I disagree.

In article <870218233112.027926@RADC-MULTICS.ARPA> Peck@RADC-MULTICS.ARPA (Rodney) writes:
>
>  Perhaps I'm not the one to be saying this, but someone should and I've
>been sitting here quitely all this time waiting for someone to speak up.
>  Will everyone PLEASE stop including other people's messages in
>theirs!!
> [...]
>             rodney
>      rodp@radc-multics.arpa

    My site received the reply to this article before it received the
article itself.  I think that this in itself says plenty in support
of continuing to include (brief and relevant) quoted sections in
replies, in order to properly define the context of the reply.

                              Dave Kohr (drk7956@cec2)
                              (Sorry, but I don't know the path.)